Writing & Rhetoric MKE
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Social Justice
    • Antiracist Literature
    • Taking Action
  • Submit
  • #4C20
    • Welcome
    • Accessibility
    • Land/Water Acknowledgement
    • Lodging & Transportation
    • Local CCCC Events
    • VisitingMKE >
      • Museums & Tours
      • Outdoor Activities
      • Recovery Groups
      • Restaurant Guide
      • Social Spaces
  • Contact

BLOG

Toward A Literacy of Accountability

12/6/2018

0 Comments

 

On Sept. 17, 2018, Whitefish Bay School District co-sponsored an event with PACE3 titled “Talking About Race: Understanding Our Own Racial and Cultural Identity” presented by Erin Winkler, an associate professor of Africology and Urban Studies at UWM. Winkler’s thesis focuses on how parents in a post-racial society tend to think they should avoid talking to young children about race. However, Winkler argues, it is detrimental to not talk about race with them because they “form racial impressions from environmental cues around them” and - far from being color-blind - form biases based on patterns in their observations. Winkler points out this tendency is not wrong or immoral, but that parents have a responsibility to talk to their children about where these patterns come from and explain systemic inequality that privilege Whites and disfavor Peoples of Color. Significantly, Winkler points out, “Get rid of the guilt. It’s not your fault that you weren’t taught in schools about how systemic structures of racism have created many inequalities. But it is your responsibility now to learn about it, to practice talking to adults about it, and to do something about it. Then you can learn to teach children about it in age-appropriate ways.”

Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to attend the event, but Winkler’s research resonates with me academically and personally. I live in Whitefish Bay – or White Folks Bay, as it commonly goes: a bubble of suburban class and race privilege. I cringe a bit every time I say it. And I often immediately add, regardless of whom I am talking to, “We used to live in Riverwest (Milwaukee is one of the most segregated cities in the U.S. but Riverwest is a small diverse community on the Eastside) for 8 years, but after terrifying instances of crime including arson, shooting, and a sword-wielding neighbor, we needed to move to a safer neighborhood”. So here my kids are – growing up in White Folks Bay, and, yes, they are safe but also learning that the world is white, or more like colorless, and comfortable. My husband and I do often talk to our children about race and class, but still…. there is an element of guilt. So learning about tools for how to talk to children about race, and knowing the event was sold out and that many others in the Whitefish Bay community have a desire to learn this too gives me comfort.
A researcher whose work helps me frame Winkler’s ideas and my own thoughts is Krista Ratcliffe who in her book, Rhetorical Listening sets up the premise that many White people, feeling race is impolite or uncomfortable to discuss, inadvertently become blind to their unearned White privilege and power, and buy into the myth about colorblindness whereby they forget and reinforce the pernicious cycle of systemic racism.
Ratcliffe urges White people to become conscious of current racial dynamics, and similar to Winkler, to foster “a logic of accountability [that] interrupt[s] our excuses of not being personally accountable at present for existing control situations that originated in the past... This logic invites us to consider how all of us are, at present, culturally implicated in effects of the past… and, thus, accountable for what we do about our situations now, even if we are not responsible for the origins” (32). For a White woman, teacher, doctoral student, and parent, the focus is moved from my guilt to my responsibility: what I can do to disrupt the perpetuation of discourses, polices, and practices that appear color-blind but are steeped in systemic structures of oppression?
Digging a bit deeper into Ratcliffe’s theory of rhetorical listening and its exigency, one might say children in their observations of patterns unconsciously overhear their environment, but that they can be helped to conscious rhetorical listening – an open-minded way of tuning in to one’s environment –through conversations. A central concept in Ratcliffe’s theory, which evokes Winkler’s argument, is “non-identification” between people who identify differently culturally and racially. With non-identification, rhetorical listeners can position themselves on “the margin between” [self and Other] and reflect on the existence of gaps while being aware of “the partiality of our visions” (73) that causes biases and stereotypes (which in my children’s case is the outcome of living in a bubble), but also to see the “agency to engage cross-cultural rhetorical exchanges across both commonalities and differences” (73). Such exchanges can be ethical and conscious choices to “interrupt unethical discourses [which include White supremacist as well as color-blind discourses] and unethical cultural structures and practices” (75) which include the racist systemic structure Winkler is also talking about. In fact, I think although Winkler talks about young children and Ratcliffe outlines pedagogical implications for rhetorical listening in college students, they enact similar strategies aiming at a situated literacy of accountability. This is the kind of literacy I most wish to nurture in my Whitefolks Bay children. -GPF
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Activism
    African American Rhetoric
    Antiracism
    Archival Research
    Art
    Asian American
    Basic Writing
    Borderlands
    Bronzeville
    Campus Event
    CCCC
    Chicanx
    Code Meshing
    Code Switching
    Community Engagement
    Community Literacies
    Composition Pedagogy
    Creative Writing
    #CSPJustice
    Cultural Rhetorics
    Decolonization
    Digital Humanities
    Disability Studies
    Diversity Rhetoric
    East Side
    #EatingMKE
    Englishes
    Ethics
    Feminism
    Field Notes
    From The Editors
    FYC
    Historic MKE
    Hostile Terrains
    Immigration
    Indigenous Rhetoric
    Labor Issues
    Language Policies
    Latinx
    LGBTQ+
    LGBTQ+ Archival Research
    Lindsay Heights
    Linguistic Diversity
    Literacy Narratives
    #LoveIsRhetorical
    Milwaukee Film Festival
    MKE Neighborhoods
    Multimodal
    Public Writing
    Qualitative Research
    Queer Archives
    Race
    Resistance
    Restorative Literacies
    Rhetorical History
    Rhetorical Listening
    Riverwest
    Shorewood
    Social Justice
    Teaching
    Translation
    Translingual
    UWM
    Virginia Burke Awards
    WAC
    Walker's Point
    Writing Center
    Writing Programs

    Archives

    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Social Justice
    • Antiracist Literature
    • Taking Action
  • Submit
  • #4C20
    • Welcome
    • Accessibility
    • Land/Water Acknowledgement
    • Lodging & Transportation
    • Local CCCC Events
    • VisitingMKE >
      • Museums & Tours
      • Outdoor Activities
      • Recovery Groups
      • Restaurant Guide
      • Social Spaces
  • Contact